Youll get a notification of failure from the test centre if your vehicle fails the test. The failure will be recorded in the secure central MOT database.
You can still drive your vehicle if it fails the test and its existing MOT certificate is still valid (ie you got it tested before the expiry date). However, you might be stopped by police and prosecuted if your vehicle is unroadworthy.
If the vehicle fails the test and the certificate has expired, you can only drive it to:
ohave the failed defects repaired
oa pre-arranged MOT test appointment
Your vehicle should be retested at the same test centre that did the original test.
I checked my bike insurance FAQ and it specifically says I am not insured to ride a bike without an MOT so am not covered to ride it to a pre-booked MOT
My refurbs take soooo long that my turnover is minimal so I don't class myself as a trader.
I have always, unwittingly, ridden my refurbs down to Jez in Exmouth for MOT without insurance
I guess its a trailer jobby from now on but what a faff plus parking a car and trailer near Jez is a 'mare
It isn't always easy for folk who work weekdays plus Saturday mornings to get their MOTs in time especially as you don't get a reminder (unless you pay for it) and they can expire in a sneaky way... Got a family member in that situation.
Anyone else experiencing a delay in getting the V5 for a new purchase? I sent one off on 8 October and no new V5 and no change showing on the DVLA database yet. Just wondered if it's time to send a copy or just be patient a while longer
Anyone else experiencing a delay in getting the V5 for a new purchase? I sent one off on 8 October and no new V5 and no change showing on the DVLA database yet. Just wondered if it's time to send a copy or just be patient a while longer
Sent copies of the V5C to DVLA a couple of weeks ago and still no sign of the new V5C - coming up to 2 months
I checked my bike insurance FAQ and it specifically says I am not insured to ride a bike without an MOT so am not covered to ride it to a pre-booked MOT
I have done that so many times completely unaware
Check your insurance as yours may be different.
Sorry to drag up an old post be this issue bothered me so I looked into it a little.
The law requires that you must have a minimum of third party insurance coverage in order to be on the road.
Insurance companies are prohibited under the Road Traffic Act 1988 section 148 (2) (b) from not paying out a third party claim due to the condition of the vehicle.
This means that having no MOT does not invalidate your insurance in the eyes of the law / police.
So the thread suggests that insurance companies might refuse to pay out on your repairs but cannot escape any 3rd party risk, thus you cannot be charged for riding without insurance as you still have insurance.
Haven't posted in a while so thought I would add to this thread. Great info above. If its a condition of the contract to have an MOT its possible for an insurance company to not pay out to you but pay the 3rd party as obliged under the traffic act. They can on occasion come after the insured (or not as the case is) to recover their loss from paying out on a policy that was in breach.
I've only read cases where somebody has sold a vehicle and left the insurance running with intention of transferring it to a new vehicle rather than letting insurance company know. The new owner was not insured and had an accident to which they where liable. As the vehicle is still insured the traffic act makes them pay up. They then almost certainly sue the previous owner for all losses as they where not informed of the sale they are still liable. So if your selling a vehicle, its a great idea to let the insurance company know ASAP to protect you from ironically the road traffic act which forces them to pay out for 3rd party for a vehicle you no longer own. Under new guidelines, you no longer have to send certificate back.
It does say in almost all policies in a section that they reserve the right to recover losses from the insured for having to pay out where they would not normally have to (road traffic act) because of the law of that country or something like that.