Devon TRF Group Forum

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: MPG


Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 1849
Date:
MPG


Found the Gassers rangebiggrin

8 (miles per litre) = 30.2832943 miles per gallon
or 68ish miles on a tank to reserve, mixed roads / riding

Never been on reserve before  - XR250

How does that compare with yours?

Biff



__________________

GG Red     4 strokes good, 2 strokes better

 

Complexity is the enemy of reliability

 



Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 1150
Date:

The RMX hits reserve at 65 miles - mixture of roads and riding.


The DRZ400e - It was 3/4 full when I got it and only had to fill it up once, but that was because I had to use it as a tanker to fill JT's KTM up twice one night hmm




__________________
Devon TRF - East Devon


Devon's Best

Status: Offline
Posts: 3670
Date:

the WR (450) normally returns 50 mpg (11 miles per litre)

8 litre tank giving 90 mile range with reserve kicking in at 70-75 miles.


__________________
East Devon. TRF member.............


Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4681
Date:

With standard gearing I was get between 50 to 60 mpg.

Not really sure where reserve kicks in as that depends allot on the terrain - plus I never really pay attention. Whenever I've been riding with my mate on his xr400 our consumption seems to be very close (mine tends to drink a tad more, could be my lower gearing).

10 litre tank (2.64 gallons) - so about 80 - 100 miles till reserve, 120 max to empty, less if mostly lanes.




__________________
jt


Powermonger!!

Status: Offline
Posts: 8129
Date:

250 EXC 2T

70+ miles and not hit reserve, I think its an 11.5L tank (poss 13 as I think Hamster said once it has a LR tank) so I guess it must be doing about 35 MPG. That was with 13/50 sprockets, just fitted 14/47 and it feels (suprisingly) a lot higher geared on the road and will now sit really comfy at 55 so am expecting the road MPG at least to improve.....Did struggle up hill in Wacky wood on Sunday though as i could not get it 'in the power' without really slipping the clutch hmm may have a play with the old power valve and wack the 'loony' spring in to see what that does ashamed


__________________

'4 wheels move the body - 2 wheels move the soul'



Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 1005
Date:

Crf 20/ litre at least!

__________________


Devon's Best

Status: Offline
Posts: 3670
Date:

jt wrote:

250 EXC 2T

(poss 13 as I think Hamster said once it has a LR tank)

I dont remember that !! must have a look sometime.

That was with 13/50 sprockets, just fitted 14/47 and it feels (suprisingly) a lot higher geared on the road

 

no suprise there thats a huge jump !!

13/50 is 3.85 ratio and 14/47 is 3.35 ratio thats about a 15 percent rise !!

smaller front or larger rear to lower gearing or vice versa.




 



__________________
East Devon. TRF member.............


Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4040
Date:

Lorns Serow and my CCM do more or less exactly the same MPG, with mine fractionally better. They both do about 75-80 to the gallon.

The XT500 does about 65mpg and has a pretty big tank and has never gone onto reserve yet!

I think the prize for P1ss poor performance fuel wise must go to the IT as it managed two gallons of fuel to 15 laps of Morgans field!

Thats about 10 to the gallon!!!!!

New jets tomorrow!

__________________
I have a hacksaw, welder and a grinder, and I'm not afraid to regret using them!



http://www.trailbikeandenduroclassics.com/index.php
jt


Powermonger!!

Status: Offline
Posts: 8129
Date:

hampsterracing wrote:

smaller front or larger rear to lower gearing or vice versa.





Yea and that was my theory - I wanted to have a bigger front (less wear I thought) so went up one = lower gearing....OK?

 

Now I was always told that 1 tooth on front = 3 on back......keep with me.....

 

So far I have lowered gearing.......yes?

 

So to compensate for the larger front which has lowered gearing I put a smaller rear on.....to gear up.....yep...thats what you say above.....

 

And with 1 on front = 3 on back if I go up one on the front I go down 3 on the back to compensate.........

 

Well that was my theory anyway but it didn't bloody work no

 

Anyway it's lovely on the tamac now.....need some supermoto wheels next wink




 



-- Edited by jt on Monday 24th of May 2010 09:21:29 PM

__________________

'4 wheels move the body - 2 wheels move the soul'



Devon's Best

Status: Offline
Posts: 3670
Date:

jt wrote:

Yea and that was my theory - I wanted to have a bigger front (less wear I thought) so went up one = lower gearing....OK?

 

NO confuse

So far I have lowered gearing.......yes?

 

NO cry

 

 

 

And with 1 on front = 3 on back if I go up one on the front I go down 3 on the back to compensate.........

 

smaller front = lower gearing
larger front = higher gearing

smaller rear = higher gearing
larger rear = lower gearing


just done this on the WR. i was running 13/50 to increase chain and sprocket life i have gone to a 14 front to keep the gearing the same i have gone to 54 rear.

13/50 = 3.846 ratio
14/54 = 3.857 ratio
14/47 = 3.357 ratio

divide rear sprocket teeth by front sprocket teeth to get the ratio.

higher ratio means lower gearing.

so a ratio of 2 would mean if the front sprocket was doing 100 RPM(revs per minute) the rear sprocket would be doing 50 RPM.

a ratio of 4 would mean the rear sprocket was only doing 25 RPM

hope this helps .............




BUT if you try to fit a 54 rear with your 14 front i expect your chain wil be too short ........................

 



__________________
East Devon. TRF member.............
jt


Powermonger!!

Status: Offline
Posts: 8129
Date:

Yea well I had had a glass or two of southern comfort at the time I had that particular brain wave.....biggrin

Yep recon chain to short to put anything much bigger on the rear now - hay ho, least it does not seem so keen to throw me off the back at the mo wink

__________________

'4 wheels move the body - 2 wheels move the soul'



Devon's Best

Status: Offline
Posts: 2009
Date:

Never really bothered to work it out on the CRF 230,  if I fill the tank brim full a decent days riding 5 to 6 hours uses about 4 to 5 litres

What i do know however is that when leading a run, the 2 smokes of whatever colour need supplies of Mr Osbournes favorite taxable fluid long before I am down to half a tank.

But thats the beauty of red even the XR 400's last  a lot longer than a lot of 250 smokers

My old XL 250R was almost as good on fuel as the 230

JT I am running 14t front 50t rear 

__________________
Riding with enthusiasm upon the ragged precipice of disaster


Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4681
Date:

Jt - all you need to do is drop the sprocket on the front 1 tooth and you'll be fine again, well better at least.
You'll probably have to put up with that gearing until you've used up the chain & rear sprocket.

__________________


Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 1690
Date:

just a note in the past ive found a comp 2T does the same tank range as a 450 T4 makes sence as the enduro crowd on 2Ts dont want to be refueling more than the 4T guys in a event so someones worked that out already then :
oh and just another thought careful kerry ! a 2T engine going bang with its fuel twice as menytimes in its combustion chamber as a 4T twice its size has the same sort of consumtion ,gearing mmmmm  aww

-- Edited by Lost on Tuesday 25th of May 2010 08:53:48 AM

__________________


Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4681
Date:

Yep, and a 2T actually allows some of the fresh fuel to pass straight out the exhaust port along with the exhaust gases - not a very economical system, trying to flush the chamber & re-fill it during the same 2 half strokes with open ports.
That's what tuned pipes & back pressure is all about - trying to stop the new fuel escaping I believe.

I hear the next generation of 2 stroke engines are direct fuel injection so will do away with this waste.
If they ever appear I'll be in the queue...

__________________
jt


Powermonger!!

Status: Offline
Posts: 8129
Date:

RichT4 wrote:

Jt - all you need to do is drop the sprocket on the front 1 tooth and you'll be fine again, well better at least.
You'll probably have to put up with that gearing until you've used up the chain & rear sprocket.



Yea, got the hang of this gearing malarky now....was 3.86, now 3.35 and if I just plonk a 13T back on the front it will be 3.61 so half way back..blankstare

I did check my theory with a 'mate' who shall remain nameless and a normally very reliable parts man in a local motorcikle emporium before I changed the bloody sprockets as well...hmm

Still I did use the ' but lads it's geared to high' excuse with success to save me having to scale Wacky mountain at the weekend biggrinwink and now I feel at least a bit vindicated....

It is peachy on the tarmac now though, really would like to try it with some road rubber on biggrin

 



__________________

'4 wheels move the body - 2 wheels move the soul'

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard