Yep I recall force is a product of mass and acceleration so,subject to sufficient grip, the back wheel is being forced past the front and whilst your life preserving response will be to stop that rear wheel forcing itself past the front by pushing the front down a wheelie will occur. When the product of the rear wheels mass and acceleration overcomes the mass you can exert in keeping the front wheeNd own and the rear retains grip an embarrassing wipeout will occur.
-- Edited by Phaedrus on Tuesday 20th of March 2012 09:22:26 PM
What's actually happening... Just something I'm been pondering.
Is the engine & frame effectively climbing up the chain.
Is the back wheel being accelerated under the front due to weight shift..
If the first is true then having a heavier rear wheel/tyre would make your bike more prone to wheelie - bring on the ultra thick tubes and a gallon of slime.
If the second is true then maybe a 19" rear wheel & tubliss system would be best as that reduces rear wheel weight and will allow wheel to spin up quicker.
The force of acceleration applies forwards from the rear axle, which is underneath the centre of gravity. The bike's (and rider's) combined inertia pulls back from the C of G. This creates a turning moment due to the opposing forces not being directly opposed. This results in the back wheel accelerating underneath the C of G, hence the wheely.
There will be an element of rotational inertia due to the mass of the rear wheel, and it is this which is employed by riders when they are in the air to position the bike for landing. However, when it comes to wheelies, this is probably not too significant.
The torque of the engine is being driven by the chain to the back wheel. The bike is operating as a lever with the fulcrum being the back axle.
The torque required to do a wheelie will be the lever arm length from the rear wheel axil to the center of mass. The center of mass can be found a couple of ways. I usually use this: x_{cm}=\frac{m_1x_1+m_2x_2+...+m_nx_n}{\sum m}
Set the origin at the rear wheel axil, and assume the motorcycle is 2D thus elliminating the z.
The x and y component can now be used to find the moment about the rear axil \tau=(Mg)r where Mg is the weight of the bike at the center of mass (total wieght) and g is the gravitational acceleration and r is the radius from the moment axis to the point of force.
where r= \sqrt{x_{cm}^2+y_{cm}^2}
You now have a radius from the rear axil to the center of mass and the center of mass is found by knowing the weight distribution of the bike (distance between the wheels, engine placement, rider placement/orientation, rider weight, weight of wheels).
In your problem, the y component would be the height (.88m) and the x component would be the distance along the x (1/2 of 1.55m). All you need is the force (weight of the bike and rider). Think about what is going on. The engine via a set of sprockets and a chain/belt must produce enough torque to cause the center of mass to rotate about the rear axil. Its just like using a torque wrench to tighten a bolt. You have a lever arm and a force.
This doesn't set the torque at the rear axil but torque is a free vector (able to move) so it will work.
I find initially accelerating gently in second or first, quickly shutting the throttle and wacking it open, catching the forks on the rebound a reasonable method. What takes the bottle/skill is getting to the balance point and keeping it there whilst covering the back brake . Not there yet .
It's the rider that pulls the 'wheely' on the bike without one it won't so forget all the physics just go out and do it.........practice will help perfect.... Simple as that!
I think what with this and your chain thread you need to actually ride your bike or buy a copy of the Karma Sutra - you have far to much time on your hands
A simple equation comes to mind from a mate of mine from many years ago on his RXS100:
Nuetral + full throttle + dump the clutch = run down seafront behind vertical bike + much laughing from mates
It's the rider that pulls the 'wheely' on the bike without one it won't so forget all the physics just go out and do it.........practice will help perfect.... Simple as that!
Without a bike a rider can't pull a wheelie all he can do is wee wee.
i did my best ever wheelie on that hill, almost running out of road(grass) the fact that it was grass and up hill gives u a bit more insurance should u fall off i guess!
A simple equation comes to mind from a mate of mine from many years ago on his RXS100: Nuetral + full throttle + dump the clutch = run down seafront behind vertical bike + much laughing from mates
I saw the same trick performed on a FS1E. After much boasting every kid in the street was lined up to watch. The front wheel came up, the rider slid off, the front wheel stayed up and the rider ran, and ran, and ran, and ran off around the corner into the next street with the front end still pointed skyward. We listened with bated breath for the crash and the scream, and heard nothing.....apart from laughter that is. Eventually someone recovered their composure sufficiently to go in search of the would be hero. The red faced idiot claimed he had saved it, astonishingly, but refused to repeat the stunt. He claimed the indicator was already broken of course.
I find initially accelerating gently in second or first, quickly shutting the throttle and wacking it open, catching the forks on the rebound a reasonable method. What takes the bottle/skill is getting to the balance point and keeping it there whilst covering the back brake . Not there yet .
Uphill slopes make it much easier.
Craig
The key on any bike is being in the right gear at the right speed, which varies between bikes.
My Firestorm: 30mph in first, open throttle smoothly and the front comes up nicely until you hit the limiter at 70mph. Whack it open and the bike will flip, so do this carefully and progressively.
XR4: Best in 2nd gear - 1st runs out of revs too quickly, and 3rd (on mine) required a bit more commitment, although possible especially on a slight rise.
CRF250x: 1st lifts much too quickly to easily control it. 2nd is ideal.
If you want to make it easy, you need to get the revs up a little, just before the main torque band starts. Stay seated, and keep your body position still in relation to the bike. Make sure you've got clear, straight, flat area in front, including time to slow down afterwards, then wind the throttle open steadily and see what happens! If nothing, then try it again and open the throttle a bit faster, or change the amount of revs when you start the attempt. The instinctive reaction is to push forward as soon as the front starts to lift, but you've got to resist this as that is exactly what you are aiming for!
Ideally, you will reach the balance point, then roll off the throttle a little to keep you at this point. This is the real key to maintaining a decent wheelie and it takes a good feel and some guts (I'm not there yet!)
Some people cover the back brake so that if it all goes **** up, a tap on the brake will bring the front wheel down again. If you have a reasonable amount of engine braking, then throttle control will maintain the height of the wheelie.
Start small, or you'll find yourself picking yourself and your bike off the ground and putting the bits in your pocket.
Oh, and don't do this on a public road, as it's frowned upon!
Note that repeated 'poor' wheelies, ending with slamming the front wheel down hard, will eventually notch your head races, so best not to do this if you can help it.
For me the main sensation around balance point is of forcing the rear wheel under the bike.
Ive not managed to hold balence point since I was six on my Raliegh Chipper ,when my dad started shouting at me. The one and only time. Never thought I'd have issues but I'm scarred for life
I had a Trusty Dandy - like a chipper but probably cheaper as my Dad does have an eye for a bargain. If Poundland was around then it would probably have come from there - nice bike though...